Category Archives: Psychotherapy

Alone Together

 

Psychologist, researcher, speaker and MIT Institute Director Sherry Turkle (Author of Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other) is going against the grain. Including her own. Turkle once passionately championed the digital technological revolution and it’s role (including the full integration of robots) in our lives. Then, she had a chance paradigm shifting experience. She was invited to witness a nursing home resident (with stories to tell and no apparent human with the time, interest or analog attention span to listen) receive daily “comfort” and “empathy” from an emotionally cue-automated seal-robot (?) She left horrified.

Now she’s at the forefront of speaking out about the impact, now and to come, of our romance/deepening dependency on all things tech. When she looks ahead, it looks dark, for many of the same reasons it does to psychotherapists and others of us working in the realm of interpersonal divides and fractured intimacy. The jury’s in. On the whole, we’re just as lonely, or more so, than ever before.

The increasing normalization of virtual substitutions for real, meaningful human contact is lulling us into a culturally digitized state of “disconnected connection.” The term “technology addictionis about to enter the lexicon. It’ll probably be recognized as a full-fledged Mental Disorder fairly soon. That’s because, Turkle maintains, technology is not only changing things for us, but about us. It’s beginning to change who we are.

I agree. I see it everywhere, at least, when I look up from my laptop long enough to take a look. Yes, the irony of “blogging” about this does not escape me. Hey, we’re all in this [alone] together.

Check out the links to her latest TED talk.


Speakers Sherry Turkle: Cultural analyst

 

Sherry Turkle

Sherry Turkle studies how technology is shaping our modern relationships: with others, with ourselves, with it.

 

Why you should listen to her:

 

Since her pathbreaking The Second Self: Computers and The Human Spirit in 1984 psychologist and sociologist Sherry Turkle has been studying how technology changes not only what we do but who we are. In 1995′s Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet, Turkle explored how the Internet provided new possibilities for exploring identity.

Described as “the Margaret Mead of digital cuture,” Turkle has now turned her attention to the world of social media and sociable robots. As she puts it, these are technologies that propose themselves “as the architect of our intimacies.” In her most recent book, Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other, Turkle argues that the social media we encounter on a daily basis are confronting us with a moment of temptation. Drawn by the illusion of companionship without the demands of intimacy, we confuse postings and online sharing with authentic communication. We are drawn to sacrifice conversation for mere connection. Turkle suggests that just because we grew up with the Internet, we tend to see it as all grown up, but it is not: Digital technology is still in its infancy and there is ample time for us to reshape how we build it and use it.

Turkle is a professor in the Program in Science, Technology and Society at MIT and the founder and director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self.

 

“What technology makes easy is not always what nurtures the human spirit.”

Sherry Turkle

Quotes by Sherry Turkle

 

  • “The feeling that ‘no one is listening to me’ make us want to spend time with machines that seem to care about us.”Watch this talk »
  • “We’re letting [technology] take us places that we don’t want to go.”Watch this talk »
  • “We expect more from technology and less from each other.”Watch this talk »
  • “We’re lonely, but we’re afraid of intimacy. And so from social networks to sociable robots, we’re designing technologies that will give us the illusion of companionship without the demands of friendship.”Watch this talk »
  • “If we’re not able to be alone, we’re going to be more lonely. And if we don’t teach our children to be alone, they’re only going to know how to be lonely.”Watch this talk »
  • “We’re smitten with technology. And we’re afraid, like young lovers, that too much talking might spoil the romance. But it’s time to talk.”Watch this talk »
  • “We all really need to listen to each other, including to the boring bits.”Watch this talk »

“You must not become too technoledged.”

(Bonus points if you know where this quote comes from)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Nashville Therapist, Psychotherapy

“Nice” or “Mean”

 

Do you belong to the Nice/Mean Club?

If not, odds are you’re closely connected to somebody who is. For this is a wide reaching, cross-cultural club. I’m referring to the stupefyingly Nice folks (code for passive, pleasing, compliant, capitulating to a fault) for whom any behavior beyond their Self-denying conditioning is perceived as sacrilege, and avoided like the plague.

Sometimes they’re the “clown.” Or at least always donning the funny/happy face, while suffering inside. Comedians know something about this. I tried it on for a while. I was an affiliate member you could say.

This way of navigating the interpersonal world is an outgrowth of protective internal marching orders where the most “unacceptable” impulses or feeling states (aggression, hostility, resentment) are firmly suppressed. Like a warm but wet and molding blanket, the socially acquiescing Nice persona keeps these emotions nicely tamped down out, of conscious awareness, but at a serious cost.

Jamming the cork so hard into the bottle sometimes results in occasional, usually solitary explosions or temporary meltdowns. The hallmark of club membership (as opposed to just having a really bad day) is the lack of curiosity or reflection on what triggered it, how and why. A quick denial & shame fueled snapping back into role typically follows.

Such injunctions are usually modeled and reinforced over and over early in life. The deeper range of emotionality and relationality and ultimately the personality itself is the real victim. “False Self” performances are (c)overtly applauded and rewarded first by caregivers, but teachers, authority figures and cultural/societal norms also collude in cementing this false dichotomy of Nice-otherwise-I’m-just-being-Mean into the individual’s consciousness and social playbook. In this paradigm, Nice equates with being good (loveable, worthy, unselfish) and Mean with bad (unlovable, unworthy, selfish; reject-able). No middle, no gray.

In the therapeutic setting, when presented with the idea that it’s sometimes necessary, even okay, to express or assert oneself- even in the kindest and most appropriate ways possible- deeply indoctrinated club members tend to conclude and almost always defend (albeit very nicely, how else?) that it is impossible, because it would be…you guessed it…Mean.

Saying “no,” expressing one’s real feelings, preferences or needs, the fear of disappointment or disapproval of another triggers anxiety, shame and guilt. But intrusions of such feelings states into consciousness gets one nearer to the escape hatch- for if these states can be recognized and temporarily tolerated, the underlying sources (allegiances), functions (purpose), pay-offs (unconscious gains) and ultimately, the costs becomes apparent. From there, liberation may be quite a ways off still, but closer. A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step...

Of course, there’s the other end of the spectrum- those who could use to extend a little more grace, compromise more, consider others needs and feelings if every once in a while. Opposite side of the coin, perhaps. But I’m referring here to those that are still paying unconscious dues on automatic debit. They may have long abandoned the Mickey Mouse club, but this affiliation runs deep. For the pangs of “disloyalty” lurk ever near the surface, ready to pounce like Jaws at a surface silhouette for the slightest hint of self-respecting assertion; need-awareness, boundary initiating– of Authenticity.

With sufficient will, a little courage and a solid therapeutic connection in your corner, the outdated emotional membership to this club can be cancelled for good.

Is this you? Are you ready? If not, it’s ok. But can you say it loud and proud, one time, without worrying about my feelings…“NO!”

Excellent. You’re on your way.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Psychotherapy

Abandonment or Engulfment?

In relationships, people may be motivated by the fear of being abandoned or engulfed. Noted author/psychotherapist David Richo, Ph.D has written that we cannot actually be abandoned, only left. While an insightful and possibly comforting distinction, to release oneself from the grip of such a powerful internal mandate to stave off real or perceived threats of abandonment at any cost can be a mighty task. Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Nashville Therapist, Psychotherapy

The Tao of Sullivan

Harry Stack Sullivan, M.D. (1892-1949) was the founder of the interpersonal theory of psychiatry. He is perhaps best known for his groundbreaking psychotherapy work with schizophrenic patients, whom he compassionately deemed “the lonely ones” (Evans, 1996). A brilliant, complicated, deeply empathic and irascible pioneer, he was among the first to deviate from Freud’s structural orthodoxy of the time. Sullivan viewed human development as forming wholly within the context of culture and inseparable from the interference of anxiety with respect to various patterns and problems in living. Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Psychotherapy

How we get off track and why psychotherapy can help

Modern psychology affirms that all the thoughts and emotions we experienced since becoming conscious are internally encoded, where ceaselessly active, they manifest in health or sickness; determining as well our perceptions and responses to all life and experience. Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Individual Therapy, Nashville Therapist, Primary Navigation, Psychotherapy